Ever heard that this is complete and utter bullshit?Slasher said:Ever heard of where children died on a school bus by being hit by a train? Then if you put your car on the tracks (and powder your rear bumper), your car will "magically" move, and little hand marks can even be seen on the back of your car afterwards? I know there's an explanation for this along the lines of "oil from your hands seep through the baby powder" but that seems very unlikely and is just a theory.
Same here.Slasher said:Or what about seeing civil war ghosts still fighting over a century later in the same battlefield dressed in their same uniforms?
Oh, come ON.Slasher said:I know this isn't exactly a reputable source either, but some of the paranormal shows on TV certainly show some sort of evidence as well.
Not a single one is legit.Slasher said:This is a whole other issue in itself, but I just also thought, what about psychics? How can they see the future? Sure, some are fake or scams, but some are surprisingly legit.
It's not unexplainable, it's called "cold reading".Slasher said:I was looked at by a psychic a few months ago, and she knew all sorts of things about me that nobody could possibly of known, even predicting some things in my life that have happened recently like car troubles (tires in particular). Just another bit of consideration leading to something unexplainable.
You do realize that we have pheromones too, right?Slasher said:Like I said before, "Well ants are really incomparable in this type of situation - they communicate by releasing pheromones which other ants basically smell, and then react too.
There is zero evidence to support the claims.Slasher said:Also, I would just like to clarify I am not in any way saying paranormal events can prove God's existence. I'm just merely using the paranormal as an example to open up the idea that something after death might in fact be real. Who knows? Maybe there is? Maybe there isn't?
And I'll bet that in every case there is nothing at all to indicate a supernatural cause, or that the so-called poltergeists magically disappeared when someone tried to confirm their existence.Slasher said:The Rosenheim poltergeist case, Enfield Poltergeist case, Canneto di Caronia fires case, as well as the Mackenzie Poltergeist. There's many more if you want them.
The others are quite similar.The Rosenheim Poltergeist case has become an extremely contentious issue. While some claim that it proves the existence of paranormal phenomenon, critics maintain it was set-up and faked, or simply an attention-seeking prank developed by the emotionally disturbed Ms Schneider. There is also no evidence on video that matches the more extreme (and, therefore, paranormal) events said to have occurred.
I'm open to anything for which there is evidence. The fact that I don't immediately jump to a supernatural explanation when I see something I don't understand isn't a sign of a lack of "openness." It's called being a skeptic.Slasher said:Sounds more like a lack of understanding and openness on your part.
Which is meaningless, because you're biased to believe it was a supernatural experience.Slasher said:It wasn't like that, and you of all people should know enough not to come to conclusions so ubruptly . Considering I never told him about this little boy, and he said "whose that" when it occured, I beg to differ. There's no evidence, just my own first person experience.
They've been debunked.Slasher said:Refer to above
Wait, what?Slasher said:Out of curiosity? Why does this phenomena occur?
You said that paranormal events haven't been proven, so I asked why we should bother disproving them, and you say "out of curiosity". Why on earth would you attempt to disprove something that has never been proven?
The "paranormal" has never been proven. There is nothing to DISprove.Slasher said:There have been efforts to disprove the paranormal, but not everything can be disproved. This leaves room for speculation.