Name a franchise that I've heard of before.
In addition, elaborate on how Microsoft has killed said franchise.
Kotaku - Final Fantasy XIV 360 Version Still A Distinct Possibility - Square Enix
-
Steam recently changed the default privacy settings for all users. This may impact tracking. Ensure your profile has the correct settings by following the guide on our forums.
Metal Gear Solid: Rising
- Thread starter eXo
- Start date
Name a franchise that I've heard of before.
In addition, elaborate on how Microsoft has killed said franchise.
Kotaku - Final Fantasy XIV 360 Version Still A Distinct Possibility - Square Enix
unlockingsky
New Member
1. i cannot name a franchise you've heard before. maybe in the near future when minds can be hackable. lol.
2. m$ killed the franchise by not producing a sequel for it along holding the franchise rights for way too long. it just drain the community out.
[RULES] Welcome to M for Mature: The Must Read for Any New User. - M for Mature Forums
Not really.
You said it's impossible now, and I said it would NEVER be possible. There is a difference.
I'm pretty sure you know what I meant by that.
It was an opinion. I didn't have hard proof to back up my opinion, thats why its just that. An opinion.
---------- Post added at 10:47 PM EST ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 PM EST ----------
Well if tomorrow, a demo of MGS Rising came on XBL and PSN and you saw that it looked worse then Portable Ops and played as badly as AC!D, wouldn't that be enough proof?
It would be possible, just not possible right this minute.
You said it would never be possible. That mean's there isn't the slightest chance.
There is a chance that MGS Rising will be crap. Its not like that's impossible.
Slasher
Suck It
Are you a developer? No? Please shut it if you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Give me a reputable source that goes in depth and explains this.
What about RE5, BioShock, COD4/5, GTA4, etc, etc? These games were in no way hindered and are all fucking great. Being a multiplatform game does not make it a hindered game, for all we know having a game work multiplatform might be a breeze.
The size of a PS3 disc vs the size of a 360 disc is obviously a proven fact that the bluray's capacity is larger but honest to god do games ever need that much space? MGS4 is probably the only game to date which comes even close but that's because they didn't compress anything. The audio alone took up the majority of that space. Compressing data or even if it came to it making 2 discs is not a big deal. Size is not such an issue that you seem to be making it out to be. Both consoles also sport an HDD so installing a game to that isn't a big deal either. Other than this small issue, I really don't see anything else hindering a title? You sound like you have a plethora of reasons.
Give me a goddamn break. The PS3 isn't all it's cracked up to be. I used to think like you and thought that the PS3 was graphically superior by a longshot, but I've been proven wrong just by looking at the titles for both. Killzone 2 is impressive, but I've seen all sorts of prettier titles on the 360 compared to the PS3 - both multiplatform and not.
Source plz? You once again have no clue what you're talking about. This is the fan boy speaking from within prancing around and spitting out BS. Also look at the link Abe posted... Exclusive...? Not quite.
Once again, give me a fucking break. This is fan child speak.
Uhm, yes, and no. Each console has great first party games. If I were to choose a console which has better first party games then I would probably choose the 360. This is coming from a guy that doesn't even own a 360 but owns a PS3.
What decent first party games does the PS3 even have? I can only think of maybe 5 of them MAX. And they aren't nearly as successful as the 360 ones have been.
Then why the fuck would you even bring them up and say that they have been killed??
It's barely any more powerful. The PS3 and 360 are god damn nearly identical as far as being powerful goes. Just look at every game made to date. I have yet to see any real graphical superiority on the PS3. I keep hearing the PS3 is more powerful, but I've yet to ever see it.
As much as I'm sure you'd love to see that happen, I doubt it. I find it hilarious how pumped you sounded for this new MGS game, but I'm sure once you found out it will also be available on the 360 you instantly turned bitter against it.
Then why do you say everything with such fucking certainty? Throw in an "In my opinion" and you won't look so stupid.
Holy crap.
You guys dont realise, that more then anything else, i want more of my favorite series in video games; Metal Gear Solid.
Literally nothing would make me more happy, then MGS Rising being amazing. I've just got a niggling feeling that Kojima, a developer who hasn't made a multiplatform game this generation, is going to either sacrifice something, or allow it to run badly on of the consoles.
Seeing as it was their idea to go multiplatform, i'm guessing they're clued up on how to do it.
You guys dont realise, that more then anything else, i want more of my favorite series in video games; Metal Gear Solid.
Literally nothing would make me more happy, then MGS Rising being amazing. I've just got a niggling feeling that Kojima, a developer who hasn't made a multiplatform game this generation, is going to either sacrifice something, or allow it to run badly on of the consoles.
Seeing as it was their idea to go multiplatform, i'm guessing they're clued up on how to do it.
twelve
I'm not dead
lol so as I thought Vee had completely made up the 'fact' that Squenix were going Sony exclusive after 13.
On paper the PS3 is more powerful, especially the Cell. Unfortunately for Sony the CPU isn't what makes the games pretty, it's the GPU and memory.
And memory is where the PS3 really suffers due to Sony making it 256MB graphics memory and 256MB system memory. The 360 has 512MB of shared memory, this can be allocated however the developer wishes. So if a PS3 version of a game is performing well without using all of the system memory the rest of that memory is wasted, if a 360 game is performing well without using all of the system memory the spare memory can be allocated to graphics to make it look even better. Same applies the other way, if they've achieved what they want to achieve with the graphics then any memory not used on 360 can be used as system memory to make it perform better, while the PS3 is wasted yet again.
chrono6456
New Member
anyone? I see conflicting reports on the internet.
Slasher
Suck It
The official teaser site or whatever has no mention of PC. It just says PS3 and 360.
twelve
I'm not dead
I would doubt it very much.
Only MGS1 and MGS2 Substance have been ported onto PC. I don't see why they would bring this one over to it.
unlockingsky
New Member
interesting concept. i wish console boards can be like a pc where you can add/swap components like memory/cpu. i remember the n64 can upgrade their onboard memory?... just reading about programming in cell cpu, it requires high skills. its like using algebra to prove your multivavariable calculus answer versus using the given theorem.
is 360 or ps3 better? thats according to individual experience. somtimes there a bits and pieces of feature i want from each technology. eg. 360 controller to be ps3 compatible, upgradable cpu/memory, and 360's natal project.
i know what i said is in favor for ps3. however, i have a grudge with m$ about my game. what actually happen on the business side is that m$ close the studio that was maintaining the franchise. then salvage the people from within. m$ liquidate/transfer the remaining asset to their own studio.
Wikimedia Error
twelve
I'm not dead
I think Lightning Bolt Action is just relaying that you play as Raiden not Snake (Raiden being the god of thunder and lightning in Japanese mythology).
Ninja's are meant to go undetected so I expect there will be an element of stealth to it still. But it will also probably be more action based to appeal to the dumber 360 audience
Ninja's are meant to go undetected so I expect there will be an element of stealth to it still. But it will also probably be more action based to appeal to the dumber 360 audience
eldiablov
Contributor
Tekken always runs as smooth as possible and I doubt the 360 is incapable of producing a smooth good looking 3d fighter O_O
You are a fanboy tbh, I bet you ate up that "only possible on PS3" line every time a Sony representative said it at E3.
---------- Post added at 08:59 AM EST ---------- Previous post was at 08:47 AM EST ----------
That's a complete contradiction ...
Your extreme views on the PS3's won't help your popularity levels Vee. The way you come across when referring to things like this makes you seem like you're in the know, when infact you're not. You're not a developer, you don't know as much as you'd like to think and you have no idea of what goes into creating a game.
Saying that MGS Rising will be a point and click because it is on 360 just makes you look like more of a fanboy.
