Looks like Gizmodo did indeed buy the lost iPhone off of the person who found it (who at the time was trying his best to return it but was getting the cold shoulder from Apple apparently). Either way, this was just a greedy move by Gizmodo and now I'm not such a big fan
Hellcat said:The more I use it, the more I envy other Smartphones that actually make use of their HW and DO have all-day features.
What good is BT if it doesn't get used?
Wow, multitasking YEARS after everyone else did.
No mass storage function....
The list goes on and on and on....
And yes, I AM selling it to get a new phone full of usable features.
Problem is, Apple is locking down their stuff way too much.
I doubt Apple would really give anybody the cold shoulder who was trying to return a phone that they would very well want back granted this isn't just one great big intentional leak. I wouldn't call it greedy. Journalists and news corporations pay for exclusive news all the time, this is really nothing new.
Yeah, gotcha, I saw that after reading the new set of Gizmodo articles they published. Well the phone should be heading back to Apple soon anyways, so it's all good. No real harm done.
Are you serious? Giz painted the guy who lost the phone as a drunk idiot, did they really need to post all the information about him?
I guess Apple brings out the douche in people.
They did no such thing. They said he was out drinking to celebrate his birthday. They specifically made mention that the guy seemed innocent, and that Apple shouldn't blame or get upset with him. I guess to each his own, how they interpret the articles, but all in all, I really don't think Gizmodo attacked him how you claimed.
If that thing can be jailbroken it looks like it'd be a good change (It looks like it can take more of a beating, as one of the largest flaws of all the iPhones and Touch's is they break EXTREMELY easy. I've even heard of them break just from temperature changes and humidity and such).